As a chiropractor in Dubin, Ireland who has worked with countless people suffering from back pain, I know how miserable it can be. You are constantly wondering if your current treatments (or lack thereof) will lead to eventually feeling better or not at all. You may also be stuck between two major options, spinal decompression and spinal fusion – both of which have proven effective at managing chronic lower back pain in many people. In this blog post, we’ll explore the difference between these two procedures and discuss the potential benefits for those looking for relief from their lower back discomfort. We’ll also look at the different circumstances where one procedure might be more beneficial than another so you can make an educated decision about what’s best for your specific situation.
As a general rule, spinal decompression is a non-surgical treatment option that aims to relieve pain through gentle stretching. Spinal fusion, on the other hand, involves fusing vertebrae together through surgery. Both options have their pros and cons, it ultimately depends on the individual case and consultation with a medical professional.
Is Decompression Surgery the Same as Fusion?
Decompression surgery, while sometimes used to treat certain spine conditions, is not the same as fusion. In fact, many doctors don’t like to recommend decompression surgeries at all and will usually try a variety of non-surgical spinal decompression techniques first. These techniques can be less invasive, safer and often just as effective in treating certain conditions. After these techniques have been exhausted and no other options are available, a doctor may then suggest a decompression surgery to relieve pain that may be associated with diseases such as herniated discs or sciatica. Either way, it is important for individuals to speak with their doctor about the best option for them before committing to any form of therapy or treatment.
What Is the Success Rate of Spinal Decompression?
Spinal decompression has no definite success rate, as no two patients are alike and no two treatments are identical. Generally, doctors don’t like it as a first line of treatment for back pain because it isn’t foolproof. Instead, they usually recommend non-surgical spinal decompression as a way to relieve pressure on the spine and reduce back pain before considering anything more serious. In some cases, this can be successful in reducing symptoms such as pain, inflammation, tingling or numbness in the leg. However, it is not a guarantee and will depend on individual factors such as health history and lifestyle habits that contribute to the effectiveness of each particular case.
Will I Ever Be the Same After Spinal Fusion?
After a spinal fusion surgery, no one can really guarantee that you will go back to the same self before the surgery. Furthermore, no doctor likes to recommend such a drastic measure unless no other option is available. Instead, doctors usually opt for non-surgical spinal decompression that often provides more effective results in terms of healing and recovery. Even though spine fusion is the last resort for extreme conditions, there is no assurance that everything will be the same after the stitches are removed.
What Are the Disadvantages of Spinal Fusion?
Spinal fusion has traditionally been viewed as a last resort for treating persistent back pain and can be seen as a ‘big gun’ approach because of the significant risks that are associated with it. Many doctors prefer to recommend non-surgical spinal decompression before considering spinal fusion. This is because no surgery is without potential complications which may include paralysis, nerve injury and issues with wound healing if not properly monitored pre and post-operatively; especially some types of spinal fusions which involve joining two or more vertebrae together using metal implants. Furthermore, although advantageous in some cases there is no guarantee that the surgery will be successful. It is therefore no wonder why doctors don’t usually like to recommend it as a first-line treatment for patients suffering from chronic back pain.
Is Lumbar Decompression Better With or Without Fusion?
Though there are no clear-cut answers to the question of whether lumbar decompression is better with or without fusion, no doctors like to recommend surgical options unless they are absolutely necessary. Thus, while some cases may call for a fusion of bones and the insertion of screws or a cage-like structure in the back, most cases can be treated successfully with non-surgical spinal decompression. This involves a non-invasive method including physical therapy and lifestyle changes in an attempt to alleviate pain and strengthen the affected area. While no one solution works for everyone, these days fewer people find it necessary to take aggressive measures such as surgery– instead opting to use more conservative means such as lumbar decompression.
Can you live a normal life after spinal fusion?
Spinal fusion may be a good option if other treatments fail, but it’s not something that doctors usually prefer or recommend. While it is possible to return to a normal life, such as work, after spinal fusion surgery, there are no guarantees. Many people find themselves unable to live as they did before their injury and may have to adjust their lives accordingly. Taking precautions like using a supportive brace, avoiding awkward postures and doing gentle stretches can help maintain spinal health even after surgery. Additionally, non-surgical spinal decompression techniques should still be explored if fusion is not the preferred method for treatment, as these techniques may provide long-term relief from debilitating pain.
Is Spinal Decompression Worth It?
Spinal decompression therapy is a non-surgical treatment option often recommended by doctors as an alternative to surgery. While no treatment is guaranteed to provide desired results, many people have found decompression therapy to be incredibly helpful in easing symptoms associated with back pain. Its efficacy depends on a wide range of factors, such as the cause of back pain and the severity of the injuries sustained. It should not be considered an absolute remedy, but rather an opportunity for a potential breakthrough in chronic back issues. Nevertheless, it is worth discussing spinal decompression with a qualified doctor or physical therapist who can advise on its appropriateness for any given individual.
How Long Does Spinal Decompression Last?
Spinal decompression has become a popular form of conservative, non-surgical treatment for various spinal issues. While individual outcomes depend on the severity and type of condition being treated, no doctor likes to ‘plaster’ patients with spinal decompression sessions longer than is medically necessary. Generally, doctors recommend no more than three to five treatments over the course of two to four weeks, interspersed with rest days so that the most benefit can be derived from any given session. It’s always best for potential patients to speak to their doctors about how long they may need to practice spinal decompression.
Who Is Not a Candidate for Spinal Decompression?
While spinal decompression is a commonly-used technique for certain pain-related issues, it’s not right for everyone. People who have had or are currently having spine surgery and those with slipped discs, fractures, and infections would not likely be eligible candidates for this non-surgical treatment. Of course, only a qualified healthcare provider can make the ultimate determination of whether this type of care is a good solution or not. However, most doctors usually prefer to prescribe non-surgical methods first unless there are no other alternative choices available that offer successful resolution of symptoms. If you believe your pain may be managed with spinal decompression therapy, it’s best to start consulting with your doctor right away to see if it may work for you.
Should I Avoid Spinal Fusion?
Spinal fusion is a form of back surgery that is often suggested for severe lower back pain. However, no one wants to go through the recovery process if it can be avoided. According to doctors, it’s best to opt for non-surgical spinal decompression first, as it can drastically reduce the amount of discomfort and disability with no invasive procedures. When you talk to your doctor about the different treatments available for serious back pain, make sure to ask about spinal fusion and understand all the pros and cons. You should always take into account no matter what procedure your doctor suggests and make sure you understand why they believe this would benefit you before coming to a decision.
Is Your Back Stronger After Spinal Fusion?
Spinal fusion is a major procedure to correct issues with the spine, but it may not be the most effective solution to strengthening your back. Generally, doctors don’t like recommending this type of surgery, and usually recommend non-surgical spinal decompression as a more conservative approach. The underlying issue causing back pain could be complex and must be treated holistically to provide lasting relief. Patients often find that making lifestyle modifications along with tailored physical therapy sessions can produce incredible results without putting their well-being in jeopardy.
Are Spinal Fusions Worth It?
Spinal fusion surgery is a major operation and can involve significant risks and costs, so it’s no surprise doctors try to avoid recommending it unless absolutely necessary. They often opt for non-surgical decompression techniques instead – because many people are able to relieve their pain without resorting to surgery. Spinal fusion has become quite successful in treating certain conditions and it may be worth considering if you have been dealing with more extreme kinds of back pain without finding relief. But overall, no one likes the idea of getting fused, so usually, a non-surgical approach will be seen as the preferred choice of treatment.
In summary, both spinal decompression and spinal fusion surgery offers potential benefits for those suffering from chronic back or neck pain. Spinal decompression is a non-surgical treatment that may be indicated for herniated discs, degenerative disc disease, sciatica, and facet syndrome. The procedure is performed by a chiropractor or physiotherapist and involves the use of a mechanical traction device to stretch the spine and relieve pressure on the nerves. Spinal fusion surgery is indicated for spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, kyphosis, tumours, deformities, and fractures. The procedure removes damaged vertebrae and fuses the remaining bones together with metal rods, screws, and bone grafts. While both procedures carry potential risks and complications (such as infection), patients can expect relief from their chronic pain after successful treatment. When considering either of these options, be sure to discuss your individual case with a qualified spine surgeon to help determine which might be best for you.
- Kim, H.S., Yun, D.H. and Huh, K.Y., 2008. Effect of Spinal Decompression Therapy Compared with Intermittent Mechanical Traction in Lumbosacral Disc Herniation. Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, 32(3), pp.319-323.
- Choi, J., Hwangbo, G., Park, J. and Lee, S., 2014. The effects of manual therapy using joint mobilization and flexion-distraction techniques on chronic low back pain and disc heights. Journal of physical therapy science, 26(8), pp.1259-1262.
- Kwon, W.A., Lee, S.H. and Lee, J.H., 2012. Effects of decompression therapy for 6 cases with lumbar herniated disc. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 13(5), pp.2133-2141.
- Kim, E., Jun, K.S. and Song, Y.S., 2010. Case report of 7 herniated lumbar disc patients treated by decompression therapy and chuna treatment. The Journal of Korea CHUNA Manual Medicine for Spine and Nerves, 5(2), pp.95-102.
- David BenEliyahu, D.C. and DACBSP, D., Spinal Decompression Studies.
- Lee, Y., Lee, C.R. and Cho, M., 2012. Effect of decompression therapy combined with joint mobilization on patients with lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 24(9), pp.829-832.
- Cholewicki, J., Lee, A.S., Reeves, N.P. and Calle, E.A., 2009. Trunk muscle response to various protocols of lumbar traction. Manual Therapy, 14(5), pp.562-566.
- Yang, D. and Uhm, Y., 2020. The effect of the lumbar segmental mobilization technique on chronic low back pain patients’ characteristics of the muscles, and limited of stability. Journal of The Korean Society of Integrative Medicine, 8(4), pp.191-202.
- Macario, A., Richmond, C., Auster, M. and Pergolizzi, J.V., 2008. Treatment of 94 outpatients with chronic discogenic low back pain with the DRX9000: a retrospective chart review. Pain Practice, 8(1), pp.11-17.